Political thoughts

^_^ Haha, oh Ama. I'm glad you came back. Only you could say things like that and me not want to beat them with a stick for being so dumb.

quater wrote:^_^ Haha, oh Ama. I'm glad you came back. Only you could say things like that and me not want to beat them with a stick for being so dumb.

I don't quite understand what you are saying really, You glad I can say that and make you not want to be mean with a stick for being so dumb, or saying those things that makes you want to beat me with a stick for being so dumb?

i have no idae what you are talking about, but i am so sore that i don't think that i will be able to sleep tonight, thanks to my STUPID LEG!!!

I doubt your leg thinks, but whatever, why does your leg hurt?

Well, if you want to know i will be in the Tread that i just created, i want to post in there for a while. see you there if you want to come.

amaterasu wrote:

quater wrote:^_^ Haha, oh Ama. I'm glad you came back. Only you could say things like that and me not want to beat them with a stick for being so dumb.

I don't quite understand what you are saying really, You glad I can say that and make you not want to be mean with a stick for being so dumb, or saying those things that makes you want to beat me with a stick for being so dumb?

You make me laugh.

quater wrote:

amaterasu wrote:

quater wrote:^_^ Haha, oh Ama. I'm glad you came back. Only you could say things like that and me not want to beat them with a stick for being so dumb.

I don't quite understand what you are saying really, You glad I can say that and make you not want to be mean with a stick for being so dumb, or saying those things that makes you want to beat me with a stick for being so dumb?

You make me laugh.

thanks for the complement, although I am not trying to do anything but udnerstand what you mean in your post I quoted above

amaterasu wrote:May I add that the only reason that George W. Bush is NOT in prison right now for war crimes against humanity is because the senate has not passed that international criminal court of Justice declaration in the U.S.A.
If they did, countries such as Iraq would bring Bush to the international Criminal Court and have Bush behind bars for bringing false evidence against Iraq into the UN and saying they bomb them in 2001. Only Britain bought it and they tried passing military action against Iraq through the Security Council but it was vetoed. Still Bush pushed and basically said your for us or against us. And broke international law attacking another country, instigating a conflict and breaking the Security Council's declaration to do nothing. Basically U.S.A. invaded Iraq on false pretenses and broke many international laws and George Bush can be put up as a dictator like Stalin or Hitler, for going into other countries and killing innocent people.

Amaterasu, I definitely understand your rhetoric and see the reasoning because I've heard it before but it doesn't make it necessarily true. Sorry. I wrote a paper, really a case, on why the US shouldn't submit to the ICC and if you knew historical examples of its failure, you might just reconsider.

You are obviously implying that Bush devised 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq. This is a fallacy because Bush specifically targets the axis of evil and if you saw his intolerance towards the malicious terrorists who did those atrocious acts, we wouldn't even need to have this conversation. Bush spent billions (more even, I know) on the War on Terror though this was a risky move for his presidency. To say Bush charged in on false charges is wrong because no President relishes going to war on blood thirsty instinct alone, increasing a deficit.

It's almost offensive when you say "False pretenses" because any and all measures should be taken to ensure the safety of one's citizens. I'll be the first to admit that the effort wasn't perfect, but the US has accomplished much groundwork and hasn't had a single attack since 9/11. I almost got drawn in by Obama's rhetoric on how we "are air raiding villages and killing innocent civilians" until I remember how some radical extremists mutilated American civilians on National Broadcasted TV seen by millions. No innocent civilian should be killed, they should be given freedom and a constitution, which seems mind-blowingly brave to me.

Titaniumxvx wrote:

amaterasu wrote:May I add that the only reason that George W. Bush is NOT in prison right now for war crimes against humanity is because the senate has not passed that international criminal court of Justice declaration in the U.S.A.
If they did, countries such as Iraq would bring Bush to the international Criminal Court and have Bush behind bars for bringing false evidence against Iraq into the UN and saying they bomb them in 2001. Only Britain bought it and they tried passing military action against Iraq through the Security Council but it was vetoed. Still Bush pushed and basically said your for us or against us. And broke international law attacking another country, instigating a conflict and breaking the Security Council's declaration to do nothing. Basically U.S.A. invaded Iraq on false pretenses and broke many international laws and George Bush can be put up as a dictator like Stalin or Hitler, for going into other countries and killing innocent people.

Amaterasu, I definitely understand your rhetoric and see the reasoning because I've heard it before but it doesn't make it necessarily true. Sorry. I wrote a paper, really a case, on why the US shouldn't submit to the ICC and if you knew historical examples of its failure, you might just reconsider.

You are obviously implying that Bush devised 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq. This is a fallacy because Bush specifically targets the axis of evil and if you saw his intolerance towards the malicious terrorists who did those atrocious acts, we wouldn't even need to have this conversation. Bush spent billions (more even, I know) on the War on Terror though this was a risky move for his presidency. To say Bush charged in on false charges is wrong because no President relishes going to war on blood thirsty instinct alone, increasing a deficit.

It's almost offensive when you say "False pretenses" because any and all measures should be taken to ensure the safety of one's citizens. I'll be the first to admit that the effort wasn't perfect, but the US has accomplished much groundwork and hasn't had a single attack since 9/11. I almost got drawn in by Obama's rhetoric on how we "are air raiding villages and killing innocent civilians" until I remember how some radical extremists mutilated American civilians on National Broadcasted TV seen by millions. No innocent civilian should be killed, they should be given freedom and a constitution, which seems mind-blowingly brave to me.

First off, I am well aware of how infective the UN is in general, ad how I really don't support it
Also I don't care what happen on 9/11 or who caused it because it is not up to me to judge that, I am just saying Bush gave false evidence for Iraq attacking them and then they went in and broke a bunch of international laws.


I guess I must have missed the hype about Obama. I think my mother's getting rid of T.V. decision actually came out for the better :D

amaterasu wrote:

Titaniumxvx wrote:

amaterasu wrote:May I add that the only reason that George W. Bush is NOT in prison right now for war crimes against humanity is because the senate has not passed that international criminal court of Justice declaration in the U.S.A.
If they did, countries such as Iraq would bring Bush to the international Criminal Court and have Bush behind bars for bringing false evidence against Iraq into the UN and saying they bomb them in 2001. Only Britain bought it and they tried passing military action against Iraq through the Security Council but it was vetoed. Still Bush pushed and basically said your for us or against us. And broke international law attacking another country, instigating a conflict and breaking the Security Council's declaration to do nothing. Basically U.S.A. invaded Iraq on false pretenses and broke many international laws and George Bush can be put up as a dictator like Stalin or Hitler, for going into other countries and killing innocent people.

Amaterasu, I definitely understand your rhetoric and see the reasoning because I've heard it before but it doesn't make it necessarily true. Sorry. I wrote a paper, really a case, on why the US shouldn't submit to the ICC and if you knew historical examples of its failure, you might just reconsider.

You are obviously implying that Bush devised 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq. This is a fallacy because Bush specifically targets the axis of evil and if you saw his intolerance towards the malicious terrorists who did those atrocious acts, we wouldn't even need to have this conversation. Bush spent billions (more even, I know) on the War on Terror though this was a risky move for his presidency. To say Bush charged in on false charges is wrong because no President relishes going to war on blood thirsty instinct alone, increasing a deficit.

It's almost offensive when you say "False pretenses" because any and all measures should be taken to ensure the safety of one's citizens. I'll be the first to admit that the effort wasn't perfect, but the US has accomplished much groundwork and hasn't had a single attack since 9/11. I almost got drawn in by Obama's rhetoric on how we "are air raiding villages and killing innocent civilians" until I remember how some radical extremists mutilated American civilians on National Broadcasted TV seen by millions. No innocent civilian should be killed, they should be given freedom and a constitution, which seems mind-blowingly brave to me.

First off, I am well aware of how infective the UN is in general, ad how I really don't support it
Also I don't care what happen on 9/11 or who caused it because it is not up to me to judge that, I am just saying Bush gave false evidence for Iraq attacking them and then they went in and broke a bunch of international laws.


I guess I must have missed the hype about Obama. I think my mother's getting rid of T.V. decision actually came out for the better :D

That was not very specific but if you say, if you say. You're my friend, and clashing doesn't do anything for the aura.

Your dear mother is getting rid of the TV so you can't see Obama? An outrage! Your pals will start thinking you live under a rock.

I support Obama, and I don't think that Bush did the BEST things for America (rather I didn't like what he did), but I'm not here to debate about it again.

amaterasu wrote:

quater wrote:

amaterasu wrote:

quater wrote:

amaterasu wrote:May I add that the only reason that George W. Bush is NOT in prison right now for war crimes against humanity is because the senate has not passed that international criminal court of Justice declaration in the U.S.A.
If they did, countries such as Iraq would bring Bush to the international Criminal Court and have Bush behind bars for bringing false evidence against Iraq into the UN and saying they bomb them in 2001. Only Britain bought it and they tried passing military action against Iraq through the Security Council but it was vetoed. Still Bush pushed and basically said your for us or against us. And broke international law attacking another country, instigating a conflict and breaking the Security Council's declaration to do nothing. Basically U.S.A. invaded Iraq on false pretenses and broke many international laws and George Bush can be put up as a dictator like Stalin or Hitler, for going into other countries and killing innocent people.

Were you born this stupid, or was it something that arose during time?

Honestly this one post is so outlandish I couldn't even begin to respond.

good

It doesn't mean you're right.

Actually it means you're so wrong that one has to worry about your sanity.

I will only say that my sanity means nothing to me, and all that I am hinges on foolishness, so I guess most people would say I am wrong about many things, doesn't mean I am though, Truth is not relative.
Also this economic fall is cause by the evil in the hearts of people of America

Only the people of America??

quater wrote:That's not WHY DF got banned. Stop saying that. It's erronerous. Kage's have been threatened dozens of times. I know a kid said he'd get a shotgun and find me in jacksonville and shoot it through my face. I didn't ban him.

Of course you know I'd be down there to protect you and shoot that kid is his face, hide his body, and run away with you to some far off distant island :D

Always-Abby wrote:

quater wrote:That's not WHY DF got banned. Stop saying that. It's erronerous. Kage's have been threatened dozens of times. I know a kid said he'd get a shotgun and find me in jacksonville and shoot it through my face. I didn't ban him.

Of course you know I'd be down there to protect you and shoot that kid is his face, hide his body, and run away with you to some far off distant island :D

Hardy Har Har ^_^

Yeah...I should have probably kept that to myself still. Oh well.

quater wrote:

Always-Abby wrote:

quater wrote:That's not WHY DF got banned. Stop saying that. It's erronerous. Kage's have been threatened dozens of times. I know a kid said he'd get a shotgun and find me in jacksonville and shoot it through my face. I didn't ban him.

Of course you know I'd be down there to protect you and shoot that kid is his face, hide his body, and run away with you to some far off distant island :D

Hardy Har Har ^_^

Yeah...I should have probably kept that to myself still. Oh well.

Nah, it's ok - we all knew he was... Troubled.

Huh what???

What is confusing you, kazekage??

What did you mean, we all knew he was troubled?

The general populace of the site seemed to know he got all moody like that.

Who?

DF

I wasn't talking about DF when I said some kid with the shotgun deal.

I could sworn you were. Man I'm screwing things up all over the place. Today is not my day. It would be a good night to just float the night away...

Is that like a referencece to drugs? ^_^

Um, just quit trying to follow my line of thoughts here, cause it's not a very clear one most of the time, even to myself. ^_^;;

Drugs??

I was thinking maybe that was the case...