Creation Vs Evolution

quater wrote:

Titaniumxvx wrote:

quater wrote:

Titaniumxvx wrote:

quater wrote:

Titaniumxvx wrote:

quater wrote:

Titaniumxvx wrote:

quater wrote:

Titaniumxvx wrote:

quater wrote:

Amaterasu wrote:

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:i'm like that too....it's like, ok Q, whatever
but sometimes...i get really pissed...so I just leave

Excuse me that post literally ruined my day....Where's the gun again?

And what's a fundamentalist? I am just a Christian Conservative.

i'm a christian
whats a conservative?

Republican.

And a fundamentalist is someone who takes the Bible Literally. So most of the world is a fundamentalist, including me.

Yeah you may not want to read it I know I type alot.

But good golly just dismissing me...

Q, I am still pondering on trying to answer your question.

I don't blame you. It's one of the greatest dropholes in the theory.

I was going to say the lake thing but that had been brought up before. Yeah, that had been bothering me. I wish there was some way to explain. It's a wonder why scientists haven't turned up exact conclusions.

Is it?

Intelligent Designers have come up with the answer. It never happened in a lake or an ocean, it happened like God said it did in the Bible. Without any real evidence for Evolution, the lack of it becomes Anti evidence, which means no evidence helps disprove it.

No, this is yet a relatively new topic. Scientists discovered DNA..what..50 years ago? That would technically mean that Darwin, Discovery Channel, and what science loves to point to- that would all be a lie of what they'ce been telling us. Call me programmed but somethings a little wrong with that picture.

I assume that by disproving evolution, you could automatically point to intelligent design off the bible is what you're saying.

Naw. If I can prove there is a creator, I have done my part. I'll let you choose who that creator is.

And relatively new? First of all, 50 years is huge in the scientific spectrum. We have accomplished buttloads more in that last 50 years then any other 50 years.

Secondly, they have had since Darwin published his book "origins".

For now, you have and I accept that. One day in the future when I find an answer to your question, I'll let you know. You've given me a challenge ^_^

Good luck.

But please, check other sites besides Evolution.Wevolved.org.

Seriously extend a little.

what? Never heard of it.
Is that even a true site?

No I was making a point.

Don't just look to evolution for the answers Titan, maybe look at Intelligent Design some too eh?

Amaterasu wrote:have you guys given up or do you want to be disproven again?

Amaterasu wrote:have you guys given up or do you want to be disproven again?

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:

Amaterasu wrote:have you guys given up or do you want to be disproven again?

nobody's been disproven, you know. At least, I don't think so

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:

Amaterasu wrote:have you guys given up or do you want to be disproven again?

nobody's been disproven, you know. At least, I don't think so

Well Evolution lost some serious ground.

But I am pretty sure the Evolutionists will hold onto every inch they can. Tis their way.

I think we are just giving this thread a break till the next time it gets brought up. Or that's what it seemed like to me.

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:there are holes on each side, as to be expected

but yay! a whole month of spamming! =D

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:there are holes on each side, as to be expected

but yay! a whole month of spamming! =D

Hah.

Still waiting for the hole in my theory ^_^

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:there are holes on each side, as to be expected

but yay! a whole month of spamming! =D

Hah.

Still waiting for the hole in my theory ^_^

which theory

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:there are holes on each side, as to be expected

but yay! a whole month of spamming! =D

Hah.

Still waiting for the hole in my theory ^_^

which theory

That God made the World in 6 days of course using creation. Sabaku surely you haven't forgotten.

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:there are holes on each side, as to be expected

but yay! a whole month of spamming! =D

Hah.

Still waiting for the hole in my theory ^_^

which theory

That God made the World in 6 days of course using creation. Sabaku surely you haven't forgotten.

right, right......just wondering if you meant the debate with me or...other...people....

you want me to attempt to break your theory?

EDIT: ok, want is a bad word, would you allow me to try?

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:there are holes on each side, as to be expected

but yay! a whole month of spamming! =D

Hah.

Still waiting for the hole in my theory ^_^

which theory

That God made the World in 6 days of course using creation. Sabaku surely you haven't forgotten.

right, right......just wondering if you meant the debate with me or...other...people....

you want me to attempt to break your theory?

EDIT: ok, want is a bad word, would you allow me to try?

I'll reply back with a rebuttal.

But I don't think I've ever been against people posting?

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:

quater wrote:

sabaku no ketsueki wrote:there are holes on each side, as to be expected

but yay! a whole month of spamming! =D

Hah.

Still waiting for the hole in my theory ^_^

which theory

That God made the World in 6 days of course using creation. Sabaku surely you haven't forgotten.

right, right......just wondering if you meant the debate with me or...other...people....

you want me to attempt to break your theory?

EDIT: ok, want is a bad word, would you allow me to try?

I'll reply back with a rebuttal.

But I don't think I've ever been against people posting?

i dunno, it just seems like you don't want to debate
it's my crappy way of asking you if you want me to post my theory again (and hopefully, won't get "I don't care" as a response)