Sisterhood/brotherhood?

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:Without a doubt your dumbest idea.

You would force us Kage's to go through EACH member and decide whether they belong to this group or that, so you can have group gender talk and promote gossip and trivialities to the site.

What am I saying? That's a great idea bloodly we'll get to work on that one right away. Really we love the idea of strong lines between Genders. This deserves immediate Application.

I do hope that the last paragraph was saracasm.

I personally thought it was a decent idea, myself. And no one ever said anything about kages.

No one else can readily take charge of the villages and be given this control can they? Would we make this a new cheif level position, the master of boys and girls?

Also, I would like to mention a friend of mine tried to do this on site smaller then ours yes, but it ended not only disasterously, but it was made to be quite stupid looking. Pm's people. They can work just fine.

Yes, that last paragraph was most definitely sarcasm.

In responce to your second paragraph, I know for a fact that Hoshikage-sama's own site has both a brotherhood and a sisterhood, and it seems to work out fine.

Also, the head person of a group does not have to be a administrater. I am not sure if they even need to be a moderator.

And Hoshikage, as in my brother's site, is how large? Not to mention, I talk consistently with Cabloo and Dark Raptor, my brother hates the idea and pointedly shows me it's faults.

They do in fact, need to be a mod, and I still have yet to hear, even a small one, a bonus to this idea.

Besides, the rapid increase of drama and secrets on the site.

It's around 200 people, if I remember right. And as far as I can tell, it's quite dead in there.

No matter how much you point out the bad points, I can still see a good point.

I have heard of a Sisterhood that had happened once, the SoHa, if I'm not mistaken. I heard it worked out quite well for a surprisingly long time.

Well I am awaiting the Good points. I asked for one. And let me tell you something else, When the bad out weighs the good, toss it. It's not a sound investment in that light.

The SoHa didn't do well. It was just a thread that people posted on. Saying it did well is like saying the Beach does well. Does it? Well people post there, but it doesn't do well it's just a place to post.

The SoHa had about half of it quit within a week of creation, the other half slowly giving up.

There are many things I'd like to say right now. But I don't think the rest of the site would want to hear me say them. Or rather read my typing.

Ah, it didn't? I was told it did rather well, by multiple people. Perhaps that is just your standpoint on it? Reality changes with perspective.

Or perhaps those who told you were those who instigated it, believing it a success despite it's obvious flaws? See it can be said both ways. But think of this. Would I say no to an idea that benefits the site? I care most about betterment of the site? If this makes users happy and grows up the site, then why would I care?

The site isn't ready to hear them. Then neither am I. Goodbye multiple reasons. ^_^

Mm... you make a good point. However, if someone wishes to try to make something similar to SoHa again, and other people agree and like the idea and wish to continue it, without causing harm to the site, why bother stopping them?

Perhaps SoHa did not work well. However, many great ideas start out as failures. It's just when it's tried again and again, and people keep perserviering, when they work out right.

Because you have missed my whole point. The idea they are asking for not only harms the site, but it's not the "Request of continuing the SoHa" at all. Look at what Bloodly's asking for.

...That would work for maybe this site, the Constitution, and the Declaration of the United States, but this is just a gender dividing drama causing group idea. It's not a noble cause worth throwing yourself into. It's just a gossip cornair. That could easily be done through PM's.

I think we're just missing each other's points. Are we even talking about the same thing? O_O;;

And just so you know... Bloodly's... kinda in the same room as me.

i don't think that kinda thing is a good idea...... that's just my opinion though..

Hiiatte wrote:i don't think that kinda thing is a good idea...... that's just my opinion though..

*shrugs*

I know that some of the girls would like to have "girl talk" with more than just 2 people at a time.

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:Without a doubt your dumbest idea.

You would force us Kage's to go through EACH member and decide whether they belong to this group or that, so you can have group gender talk and promote gossip and trivialities to the site.

What am I saying? That's a great idea bloodly we'll get to work on that one right away. Really we love the idea of strong lines between Genders. This deserves immediate Application.

I do hope that the last paragraph was saracasm.

I personally thought it was a decent idea, myself. And no one ever said anything about kages.

No one else can readily take charge of the villages and be given this control can they? Would we make this a new cheif level position, the master of boys and girls?

Also, I would like to mention a friend of mine tried to do this on site smaller then ours yes, but it ended not only disasterously, but it was made to be quite stupid looking. Pm's people. They can work just fine.

Yes, that last paragraph was most definitely sarcasm.

In responce to your second paragraph, I know for a fact that Hoshikage-sama's own site has both a brotherhood and a sisterhood, and it seems to work out fine.

Also, the head person of a group does not have to be a administrater. I am not sure if they even need to be a moderator.

And Hoshikage, as in my brother's site, is how large? Not to mention, I talk consistently with Cabloo and Dark Raptor, my brother hates the idea and pointedly shows me it's faults.

They do in fact, need to be a mod, and I still have yet to hear, even a small one, a bonus to this idea.

Besides, the rapid increase of drama and secrets on the site.

It's around 200 people, if I remember right. And as far as I can tell, it's quite dead in there.

No matter how much you point out the bad points, I can still see a good point.

I have heard of a Sisterhood that had happened once, the SoHa, if I'm not mistaken. I heard it worked out quite well for a surprisingly long time.

Well I am awaiting the Good points. I asked for one. And let me tell you something else, When the bad out weighs the good, toss it. It's not a sound investment in that light.

The SoHa didn't do well. It was just a thread that people posted on. Saying it did well is like saying the Beach does well. Does it? Well people post there, but it doesn't do well it's just a place to post.

The SoHa had about half of it quit within a week of creation, the other half slowly giving up.

There are many things I'd like to say right now. But I don't think the rest of the site would want to hear me say them. Or rather read my typing.

Ah, it didn't? I was told it did rather well, by multiple people. Perhaps that is just your standpoint on it? Reality changes with perspective.

Or perhaps those who told you were those who instigated it, believing it a success despite it's obvious flaws? See it can be said both ways. But think of this. Would I say no to an idea that benefits the site? I care most about betterment of the site? If this makes users happy and grows up the site, then why would I care?

The site isn't ready to hear them. Then neither am I. Goodbye multiple reasons. ^_^

Mm... you make a good point. However, if someone wishes to try to make something similar to SoHa again, and other people agree and like the idea and wish to continue it, without causing harm to the site, why bother stopping them?

Perhaps SoHa did not work well. However, many great ideas start out as failures. It's just when it's tried again and again, and people keep perserviering, when they work out right.

Because you have missed my whole point. The idea they are asking for not only harms the site, but it's not the "Request of continuing the SoHa" at all. Look at what Bloodly's asking for.

...That would work for maybe this site, the Constitution, and the Declaration of the United States, but this is just a gender dividing drama causing group idea. It's not a noble cause worth throwing yourself into. It's just a gossip cornair. That could easily be done through PM's.

I think we're just missing each other's points. Are we even talking about the same thing? O_O;;

And just so you know... Bloodly's... kinda in the same room as me.

We're not arguing for the same thing at all. I dislike this idea.

And so? Bloodly has as much right to see this as anyone. It's her idea. She should hear why I dislike it.

But Bloodly and you, go read what you are asking for and compare it to the SoHa. But in case you want me to, I'll give ya a hint.

SoHa was a thread run by 3 or 4 people that lasted a few weeks and died off due to the fact that it was not just bad, but it was dumb. No one liked it.

Now what is this you are asking? You ask for a permentation of seperate gender blocs, forcing us Kage's or who ever to run them and fix them, and make sure they stay active, so you users can once again talk about nothingness as the SoHa was.

A thread, a law enacted in all 6 villages that...A thread...A Law...

What's the difference? Can ya tell?

i get it now....

Hiiatte wrote:i get it now....

Heh.

If this was to me sorry about my obnoxiousness but I am trying to get across my points that seem to be failing.

well, i get them now!

Alright.

I wasn't really arguing at you Hiiate it was more to Pika.

k!

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:Without a doubt your dumbest idea.

You would force us Kage's to go through EACH member and decide whether they belong to this group or that, so you can have group gender talk and promote gossip and trivialities to the site.

What am I saying? That's a great idea bloodly we'll get to work on that one right away. Really we love the idea of strong lines between Genders. This deserves immediate Application.

I do hope that the last paragraph was saracasm.

I personally thought it was a decent idea, myself. And no one ever said anything about kages.

No one else can readily take charge of the villages and be given this control can they? Would we make this a new cheif level position, the master of boys and girls?

Also, I would like to mention a friend of mine tried to do this on site smaller then ours yes, but it ended not only disasterously, but it was made to be quite stupid looking. Pm's people. They can work just fine.

Yes, that last paragraph was most definitely sarcasm.

In responce to your second paragraph, I know for a fact that Hoshikage-sama's own site has both a brotherhood and a sisterhood, and it seems to work out fine.

Also, the head person of a group does not have to be a administrater. I am not sure if they even need to be a moderator.

And Hoshikage, as in my brother's site, is how large? Not to mention, I talk consistently with Cabloo and Dark Raptor, my brother hates the idea and pointedly shows me it's faults.

They do in fact, need to be a mod, and I still have yet to hear, even a small one, a bonus to this idea.

Besides, the rapid increase of drama and secrets on the site.

It's around 200 people, if I remember right. And as far as I can tell, it's quite dead in there.

No matter how much you point out the bad points, I can still see a good point.

I have heard of a Sisterhood that had happened once, the SoHa, if I'm not mistaken. I heard it worked out quite well for a surprisingly long time.

Well I am awaiting the Good points. I asked for one. And let me tell you something else, When the bad out weighs the good, toss it. It's not a sound investment in that light.

The SoHa didn't do well. It was just a thread that people posted on. Saying it did well is like saying the Beach does well. Does it? Well people post there, but it doesn't do well it's just a place to post.

The SoHa had about half of it quit within a week of creation, the other half slowly giving up.

There are many things I'd like to say right now. But I don't think the rest of the site would want to hear me say them. Or rather read my typing.

Ah, it didn't? I was told it did rather well, by multiple people. Perhaps that is just your standpoint on it? Reality changes with perspective.

Or perhaps those who told you were those who instigated it, believing it a success despite it's obvious flaws? See it can be said both ways. But think of this. Would I say no to an idea that benefits the site? I care most about betterment of the site? If this makes users happy and grows up the site, then why would I care?

The site isn't ready to hear them. Then neither am I. Goodbye multiple reasons. ^_^

Mm... you make a good point. However, if someone wishes to try to make something similar to SoHa again, and other people agree and like the idea and wish to continue it, without causing harm to the site, why bother stopping them?

Perhaps SoHa did not work well. However, many great ideas start out as failures. It's just when it's tried again and again, and people keep perserviering, when they work out right.

Because you have missed my whole point. The idea they are asking for not only harms the site, but it's not the "Request of continuing the SoHa" at all. Look at what Bloodly's asking for.

...That would work for maybe this site, the Constitution, and the Declaration of the United States, but this is just a gender dividing drama causing group idea. It's not a noble cause worth throwing yourself into. It's just a gossip cornair. That could easily be done through PM's.

I think we're just missing each other's points. Are we even talking about the same thing? O_O;;

And just so you know... Bloodly's... kinda in the same room as me.

We're not arguing for the same thing at all. I dislike this idea.

And so? Bloodly has as much right to see this as anyone. It's her idea. She should hear why I dislike it.

But Bloodly and you, go read what you are asking for and compare it to the SoHa. But in case you want me to, I'll give ya a hint.

SoHa was a thread run by 3 or 4 people that lasted a few weeks and died off due to the fact that it was not just bad, but it was dumb. No one liked it.

Now what is this you are asking? You ask for a permentation of seperate gender blocs, forcing us Kage's or who ever to run them and fix them, and make sure they stay active, so you users can once again talk about nothingness as the SoHa was.

A thread, a law enacted in all 6 villages that...A thread...A Law...

What's the difference? Can ya tell?

You have every right to dislike it.

And actually, it wasn't bloodly's orgional idea. And yes, she is reading over my shoulder right now. She doesn't... really care.

As far as I know, you can be in more than one "group"
So, in essense... How I see it anyways, it's just a thread, like a village forum. I, truthfully, don't care for the idea much. I see it as an oppertunity, and a way for people to get to know eachother better, without.... other things such as gender getting in the way. I know that some people are too afraid to go into the bar because of certain reasons, and this could provide a reason for them to get more active.

And personally, I would be more than willing myself to run this, and I am sure bloodly will be willing as well.

And the difference? No, I'm sorry, but I cannot tell. Perhaps it is only me.

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:Without a doubt your dumbest idea.

You would force us Kage's to go through EACH member and decide whether they belong to this group or that, so you can have group gender talk and promote gossip and trivialities to the site.

What am I saying? That's a great idea bloodly we'll get to work on that one right away. Really we love the idea of strong lines between Genders. This deserves immediate Application.

I do hope that the last paragraph was saracasm.

I personally thought it was a decent idea, myself. And no one ever said anything about kages.

No one else can readily take charge of the villages and be given this control can they? Would we make this a new cheif level position, the master of boys and girls?

Also, I would like to mention a friend of mine tried to do this on site smaller then ours yes, but it ended not only disasterously, but it was made to be quite stupid looking. Pm's people. They can work just fine.

Yes, that last paragraph was most definitely sarcasm.

In responce to your second paragraph, I know for a fact that Hoshikage-sama's own site has both a brotherhood and a sisterhood, and it seems to work out fine.

Also, the head person of a group does not have to be a administrater. I am not sure if they even need to be a moderator.

And Hoshikage, as in my brother's site, is how large? Not to mention, I talk consistently with Cabloo and Dark Raptor, my brother hates the idea and pointedly shows me it's faults.

They do in fact, need to be a mod, and I still have yet to hear, even a small one, a bonus to this idea.

Besides, the rapid increase of drama and secrets on the site.

It's around 200 people, if I remember right. And as far as I can tell, it's quite dead in there.

No matter how much you point out the bad points, I can still see a good point.

I have heard of a Sisterhood that had happened once, the SoHa, if I'm not mistaken. I heard it worked out quite well for a surprisingly long time.

Well I am awaiting the Good points. I asked for one. And let me tell you something else, When the bad out weighs the good, toss it. It's not a sound investment in that light.

The SoHa didn't do well. It was just a thread that people posted on. Saying it did well is like saying the Beach does well. Does it? Well people post there, but it doesn't do well it's just a place to post.

The SoHa had about half of it quit within a week of creation, the other half slowly giving up.

There are many things I'd like to say right now. But I don't think the rest of the site would want to hear me say them. Or rather read my typing.

Ah, it didn't? I was told it did rather well, by multiple people. Perhaps that is just your standpoint on it? Reality changes with perspective.

Or perhaps those who told you were those who instigated it, believing it a success despite it's obvious flaws? See it can be said both ways. But think of this. Would I say no to an idea that benefits the site? I care most about betterment of the site? If this makes users happy and grows up the site, then why would I care?

The site isn't ready to hear them. Then neither am I. Goodbye multiple reasons. ^_^

Mm... you make a good point. However, if someone wishes to try to make something similar to SoHa again, and other people agree and like the idea and wish to continue it, without causing harm to the site, why bother stopping them?

Perhaps SoHa did not work well. However, many great ideas start out as failures. It's just when it's tried again and again, and people keep perserviering, when they work out right.

Because you have missed my whole point. The idea they are asking for not only harms the site, but it's not the "Request of continuing the SoHa" at all. Look at what Bloodly's asking for.

...That would work for maybe this site, the Constitution, and the Declaration of the United States, but this is just a gender dividing drama causing group idea. It's not a noble cause worth throwing yourself into. It's just a gossip cornair. That could easily be done through PM's.

I think we're just missing each other's points. Are we even talking about the same thing? O_O;;

And just so you know... Bloodly's... kinda in the same room as me.

We're not arguing for the same thing at all. I dislike this idea.

And so? Bloodly has as much right to see this as anyone. It's her idea. She should hear why I dislike it.

But Bloodly and you, go read what you are asking for and compare it to the SoHa. But in case you want me to, I'll give ya a hint.

SoHa was a thread run by 3 or 4 people that lasted a few weeks and died off due to the fact that it was not just bad, but it was dumb. No one liked it.

Now what is this you are asking? You ask for a permentation of seperate gender blocs, forcing us Kage's or who ever to run them and fix them, and make sure they stay active, so you users can once again talk about nothingness as the SoHa was.

A thread, a law enacted in all 6 villages that...A thread...A Law...

What's the difference? Can ya tell?

You have every right to dislike it.

And actually, it wasn't bloodly's orgional idea. And yes, she is reading over my shoulder right now. She doesn't... really care.

As far as I know, you can be in more than one "group"
So, in essense... How I see it anyways, it's just a thread, like a village forum. I, truthfully, don't care for the idea much. I see it as an oppertunity, and a way for people to get to know eachother better, without.... other things such as gender getting in the way. I know that some people are too afraid to go into the bar because of certain reasons, and this could provide a reason for them to get more active.

And personally, I would be more than willing myself to run this, and I am sure bloodly will be willing as well.

And the difference? No, I'm sorry, but I cannot tell. Perhaps it is only me.

Alright. Tell those people to stay in the inbox.

I am sorry, but if people are to afraid to meet others because of Gender, then they will not survive in the real world.

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

quater wrote:Without a doubt your dumbest idea.

You would force us Kage's to go through EACH member and decide whether they belong to this group or that, so you can have group gender talk and promote gossip and trivialities to the site.

What am I saying? That's a great idea bloodly we'll get to work on that one right away. Really we love the idea of strong lines between Genders. This deserves immediate Application.

I do hope that the last paragraph was saracasm.

I personally thought it was a decent idea, myself. And no one ever said anything about kages.

No one else can readily take charge of the villages and be given this control can they? Would we make this a new cheif level position, the master of boys and girls?

Also, I would like to mention a friend of mine tried to do this on site smaller then ours yes, but it ended not only disasterously, but it was made to be quite stupid looking. Pm's people. They can work just fine.

Yes, that last paragraph was most definitely sarcasm.

In responce to your second paragraph, I know for a fact that Hoshikage-sama's own site has both a brotherhood and a sisterhood, and it seems to work out fine.

Also, the head person of a group does not have to be a administrater. I am not sure if they even need to be a moderator.

And Hoshikage, as in my brother's site, is how large? Not to mention, I talk consistently with Cabloo and Dark Raptor, my brother hates the idea and pointedly shows me it's faults.

They do in fact, need to be a mod, and I still have yet to hear, even a small one, a bonus to this idea.

Besides, the rapid increase of drama and secrets on the site.

It's around 200 people, if I remember right. And as far as I can tell, it's quite dead in there.

No matter how much you point out the bad points, I can still see a good point.

I have heard of a Sisterhood that had happened once, the SoHa, if I'm not mistaken. I heard it worked out quite well for a surprisingly long time.

Well I am awaiting the Good points. I asked for one. And let me tell you something else, When the bad out weighs the good, toss it. It's not a sound investment in that light.

The SoHa didn't do well. It was just a thread that people posted on. Saying it did well is like saying the Beach does well. Does it? Well people post there, but it doesn't do well it's just a place to post.

The SoHa had about half of it quit within a week of creation, the other half slowly giving up.

There are many things I'd like to say right now. But I don't think the rest of the site would want to hear me say them. Or rather read my typing.

Ah, it didn't? I was told it did rather well, by multiple people. Perhaps that is just your standpoint on it? Reality changes with perspective.

Or perhaps those who told you were those who instigated it, believing it a success despite it's obvious flaws? See it can be said both ways. But think of this. Would I say no to an idea that benefits the site? I care most about betterment of the site? If this makes users happy and grows up the site, then why would I care?

The site isn't ready to hear them. Then neither am I. Goodbye multiple reasons. ^_^

Mm... you make a good point. However, if someone wishes to try to make something similar to SoHa again, and other people agree and like the idea and wish to continue it, without causing harm to the site, why bother stopping them?

Perhaps SoHa did not work well. However, many great ideas start out as failures. It's just when it's tried again and again, and people keep perserviering, when they work out right.

Because you have missed my whole point. The idea they are asking for not only harms the site, but it's not the "Request of continuing the SoHa" at all. Look at what Bloodly's asking for.

...That would work for maybe this site, the Constitution, and the Declaration of the United States, but this is just a gender dividing drama causing group idea. It's not a noble cause worth throwing yourself into. It's just a gossip cornair. That could easily be done through PM's.

I think we're just missing each other's points. Are we even talking about the same thing? O_O;;

And just so you know... Bloodly's... kinda in the same room as me.

We're not arguing for the same thing at all. I dislike this idea.

And so? Bloodly has as much right to see this as anyone. It's her idea. She should hear why I dislike it.

But Bloodly and you, go read what you are asking for and compare it to the SoHa. But in case you want me to, I'll give ya a hint.

SoHa was a thread run by 3 or 4 people that lasted a few weeks and died off due to the fact that it was not just bad, but it was dumb. No one liked it.

Now what is this you are asking? You ask for a permentation of seperate gender blocs, forcing us Kage's or who ever to run them and fix them, and make sure they stay active, so you users can once again talk about nothingness as the SoHa was.

A thread, a law enacted in all 6 villages that...A thread...A Law...

What's the difference? Can ya tell?

You have every right to dislike it.

And actually, it wasn't bloodly's orgional idea. And yes, she is reading over my shoulder right now. She doesn't... really care.

As far as I know, you can be in more than one "group"
So, in essense... How I see it anyways, it's just a thread, like a village forum. I, truthfully, don't care for the idea much. I see it as an oppertunity, and a way for people to get to know eachother better, without.... other things such as gender getting in the way. I know that some people are too afraid to go into the bar because of certain reasons, and this could provide a reason for them to get more active.

And personally, I would be more than willing myself to run this, and I am sure bloodly will be willing as well.

And the difference? No, I'm sorry, but I cannot tell. Perhaps it is only me.

Alright. Tell those people to stay in the inbox.

I am sorry, but if people are to afraid to meet others because of Gender, then they will not survive in the real world.

Alright, then, may I suggest something different then?

On facebook, there is a thing that you use as an inbox, and you may have multiple people in it at the same time. Almost like a forum thread, only you have to invite people. Hm... the more I think of it, the stupider it sounds. Ah well. Perhaps we could have something like that, a multi-way pm system.

The real world is tough. Right now, as children, we live in a protected bubble created to mask it. So, wouldn't it be fine, for now, as children, to remain obvlious?

If you keep things like that from "Kids" most people here are 14+...they need to be able to talk to the other gender..

Banouin wrote:If you keep things like that from "Kids" most people here are 14+...they need to be able to talk to the other gender..

The person I have in mind is 12 ^^;

pika-chan wrote:

Banouin wrote:If you keep things like that from "Kids" most people here are 14+...they need to be able to talk to the other gender..

The person I have in mind is 12 ^^;

12?....ya still...you need to be talking the other gender at like...god i dont know, My BF is a girl that I knew like all my life. if you are 12, you should be able to talk to the other gender like nothing

Banouin wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

Banouin wrote:If you keep things like that from "Kids" most people here are 14+...they need to be able to talk to the other gender..

The person I have in mind is 12 ^^;

12?....ya still...you need to be talking the other gender at like...god i dont know, My BF is a girl that I knew like all my life. if you are 12, you should be able to talk to the other gender like nothing

Mm... I had a great deal of trouble talking to the other gender until recentally... And I'm kinda... 16.

hmmm

Mm... I guess it's just different with different people.

pika-chan wrote:

Banouin wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

Banouin wrote:If you keep things like that from "Kids" most people here are 14+...they need to be able to talk to the other gender..

The person I have in mind is 12 ^^;

12?....ya still...you need to be talking the other gender at like...god i dont know, My BF is a girl that I knew like all my life. if you are 12, you should be able to talk to the other gender like nothing

Mm... I had a great deal of trouble talking to the other gender until recentally... And I'm kinda... 16.

then..there is something wrong..i dont know if it was bc my BF was a girl..but at 12 It was nothing talking to girls...but I did spend just about all the time with them...I dont know why, I do better around girls, Then I do guys

Banouin wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

Banouin wrote:

pika-chan wrote:

Banouin wrote:If you keep things like that from "Kids" most people here are 14+...they need to be able to talk to the other gender..

The person I have in mind is 12 ^^;

12?....ya still...you need to be talking the other gender at like...god i dont know, My BF is a girl that I knew like all my life. if you are 12, you should be able to talk to the other gender like nothing

Mm... I had a great deal of trouble talking to the other gender until recentally... And I'm kinda... 16.

then..there is something wrong..i dont know if it was bc my BF was a girl..but at 12 It was nothing talking to girls...but I did spend just about all the time with them...I dont know why, I do better around girls, Then I do guys

Well... I had trouble talking to... well, anyone.

The multi way PM system wouldn't be so bad if the site was larger

knssquad wrote:The multi way PM system wouldn't be so bad if the site was larger

Bloodly: IT WAS MY IDEA! =D

*had a good idea* <--- she thinks.

it would be....odd if you ask me

I do not see how it would truly be odd.

but at the same time, a multi way PM system would have drawbacks