WOTNOPOLIS

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.


+23
Angelic Harmony
TheFirstKnight
Ikazu Raiken
CLAIRVOYANTdisease
SickSelfishSyQo
Always-Abby
tsuki_uchiha
Little_Shiro
amaterasu
NarutoBoyFreakah
seshimazi
Meika-Chan
knssquad
KarateKeyaQ
Titaniumxvx
Sasori Kung fu masta
CrispinFreemanWatcher16
Aichu
spyke543
PeinQAkatsuki
3.2.1.0.84.NG!
AtaruSabrMaster
quater
27 posters

    The Worse book you have ever read

    Poll

    Who assigned this book?

    [ 14 ]
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 2HwAlpQ78%The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 ORIszmu [78%] 
    [ 2 ]
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 2HwAlpQ11%The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 ORIszmu [11%] 
    [ 2 ]
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 2HwAlpQ11%The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 ORIszmu [11%] 

    Total Votes: 18
    Titaniumxvx
    Titaniumxvx
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 21997
    Age : 31
    Village : Scorpion
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue100 / 100100 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2007-08-16

    AMP
    Natural: 5
    Power:
    Instinct: 5

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Titaniumxvx Sat Sep 27 2008, 15:29

    Always-Abby wrote:Twilight.
    Dear Lord, someone pass over the asprin.

    There are a bunch of reasons why I didn't like it. But, I flound a review on GoodReads that sums it all up:

    "1. Lack of characterization:
    Bella- Okay... I absolutely hated this girl. She was the worst female protagonist I have ever read about! She's stupid, shallow, selfish and just plain annoying! Not to mention she's pathetically dependent on Edward... I mean, come on, NO girl should be that dependent on a boy, not only is that pathetic, but it is very unhealthy. She was also a clumsy little damsel in distress who was dumb enough to get herself into situations that she couldn't get out of. I would have loved for Meyer to have given her a backbone, so she could have done something useful instead of whining and doing stupid, idiotic things that no remotely intelligent teenage girl would actually do. Not to mention the fact that she is apparently very "plain" looking... if that's the case then why are there several guys fawning over her? She's a Mary Sue, simple as that. And I hate Mary Sues.
    Edward- Okay, this boy is just way too possessive and stalkerish (it is not romantic of him to sneak into Bella's room and watch her sleep! It's creepy and wrong!) Oh, and "bad boys" usually, don't sit there and say "I'm dangerous, stay away" etc. all the time.... I also hated the fact that Bella described some part of his body every other page. It was completely UNNECESSARY!! Okay, we get the fact that he's hot, Bella... now MOVE ON!

    I could go on and on about all the characters... every single one of them was a flat, cardboard cut-out that did not seem realistic at all.

    2. Writing style:
    Purple Prose- Ew... to this... seriously, all the purple prose made me want to throw the book across the room. Enough said.

    3. Descriptions:
    I know I said up there that I got sick of reading about how gorgeous some part of Edward's body was every other paragraph... and if that wasn't bad enough... what's worse than is the fact that even with all that unnecessary description of him and everyone else (though mostly him, since Bella is that shallow) I still had a hard time picturing him or any of the characters in my head, for that matter. I also had a hard time picturing a lot of the setting and the action in my head as well. It's kind of sad really... there was so much description, you would think that everything (Edward especially) would be embedded into my brain, but no. That's what makes me wonder why so many fans find Edward so "hot", I never got a clear picture of him in my head to even begin to form an opinion about whether he was "hot" or not.

    4. Plot:
    Okay, the plot gets it's own category because it pissed me off so much. I mean, seriously... where was it?! It was nothing but sappy, gag worthy fluff between Edward and Bella until page 400 or so, when something finally happened. And, even then... it went by so fast and was not explained well at all. It seemed to me that Meyer just threw it in there, and it was only put there in the first place, so that she could point at it and say, "Look, there's a plot right there.", when people like me came around and said otherwise. But that's not a plot!! The plot should not take 400 pages to start! And no the whole "romance" between Bella and Edward is not the plot!!

    6. Plot holes
    The one thing that drove me absolutely CRAZY was the the fact that no one in the small town of Forks noticed that the Cullens never aged! And the "children" never graduated and went on to college. I mean, if they've been there for more than four years, than I'm assuming that someone would have noticed! I mean, the town could not be full of that many morons! Speaking of school, why in the world would they willingly choose to take high school over and over again? I know they need to "fit in", but seriously.. . that's just stupid... someone is bound to figure out sooner or later.

    Oh, I love the fans response to this, it usually goes like this: "Well it is a fictional book." That's a stupid reason. Just because it's a book with vampires doesn't mean it's exempt from having to be realistic and having glaring plot holes.

    7. Vampires
    Like I said before, I'm a big vampire fan. But, this book is an embarrassment to vampire fiction. The vampires are pathetic, sweet, innocent, almost "misunderstood" creatures. I know that Meyer has every right to create her own idea about vampires, but come on! Sparkling vampires?! Vegetarian vampires? That's just ridiculous! All the other myths about vampires are nonexistent. The whole sparkling vampire idea just seemed to be there because Meyer wanted a reason as to why the vampires could even walk around in the daylight to begin with. The idea was just a convenient way for her to write the vampires... who, were way too human like for my tastes. Oh, and not to mention the fact that they had all the good things when it came to being a vampire, but none of the bad things (ex: they don't burn in sunlight, they sparkle, they all have certain powers, but none of them have the bad things that come with them, etc.)

    I don't like my vampires to be blood thirsty monsters that kill everything in sight. But, I also don't want them to be so pathetic and innocent either. The only two vampiric qualities that are there are the ones that are well known among everyone: drinking blood and being immortal. Otherwise, the Cullens are disgustingly human like.

    I think the thing I have the problem with the most is the fact that Meyer has never seen any vampire movies/t.v. shows are read any vampire novels. If she had, I would have been able to respect her ideas more because at least then she would have done her research. It's quite obvious that she had no idea what she was doing when she created the vampires in this story.

    Where the vampires are concerned, this novel is an embarrassment to vampire/supernatural fiction.

    8. Messages
    I am somewhat appalled at the messages that this book sends out.. they are so anti-feminist, it's disgusting:
    1. It's perfectly okay to have no goals or aspirations or even an education, just get yourself a man and he'll take care of you.
    2. It's also perfectly okay to like someone because of their physical features... this is not love people, it's lust! They have nothing in common! He likes her because she smells nice and she likes him because he's hot.
    3. When you have several guys fawning over you pick the hottest one of them all because looks are so very important.
    4. It's okay if the guy you love sneaks into your bedroom and watches you sleep at night... that's completely normal and romantic... not the the least bit creepy or stalkerish.

    9. The Obsession:
    Well, this gets its own category, mostly because I just don't understand what all the obsession is over... it's a book, and a poorly written one at that. I run across girls all the time arguing over who Edward "belongs" to... it's pathetic and kind of scary. He's a book character... he doesn't belong to anyone, but Meyer, since she's the one that created him.

    This was obviously a fulfillment story that I would expect a preteen to write on her livejournal. This is not a book I would expect a thirty something year old women with a
    college education to write and actually attempt and then succeed in getting published. And, it was a degree in English... seriously, I would have expected much better from someone who had that degree... since she spent college studying books and analyzing them etc. you would think that she would know how to write one the proper way...

    Meyer could have made this book great, but no... instead she took the easy way out: a cliched, simple, overused plot and added vampires to it(as if that made it any different).

    Honestly, I've read better over on fictionpress.com... and that's really sad, because most of the authors over there are between the ages of 14 and 26 and are amateurs in the field. Maybe, if Meyer had posted this up there first, it would have been a much better story because the good writers over there would have set her straight. Maybe then, I would have been able to get through the novel, because it might have actually been good!

    And, oh just for the record... Twilight is NOT the next Harry Potter, nor is it better than Harry Potter... I say that not only because JK Rowling actually has talent, but also because they are in completely different genres and can't really be compared.

    Though, it does make me sick to see Harry Potter even mentioned in the same sentence as this piece of crap... (unfortunately, that couldn't be avoided in this review) and it's an insult to JK Rowling to have her amazing writing compared to the horrible writing of Stephenie Meyer..."

    That was a monster post, Abby, just huge. I have to give you props because they were insightful and cutting. Liked em!

    I wish Meyer would have stopped after the 1st book, Twilight. The rest seemed to ruin everything, I mean, there is only so much fiction that someone can take. I read Twilight because our teacher initially asked everyone to read it for extra credit and I admit, I liked it, I was left with a warm feeling of contentness like “Wow, vampires. Interesting”. The next three books were next to impossible. Sometimes, sequels should just stop somewhere. So I give it a 5.

    Ms. Steph made it into a money-making cow machine putting book after book out, not paying attention to the less than lived up to books or the wearied fans. That is what I call selling out ethics. I wish she hadn't done that. Such a day ruiner.

    My favorite part of your whole speech was that there is only so much you can hear about Edward. “Edward’s hair, Edward’s eyes…so gold…so bronze, so beautiful! I’m lost in them! I look so plain! So gorgeous! I look like such a simpleton standing next to him. I’m cutting myself out of the picture now!” (Ah…I thought that was hilarious. Simply hilarious)

    The protagonist, Bella, is based of Stephanie Meyer, I am not even kidding. You take a look at Meyer, and that is her exact description of Bella. Yes, if you look at her picture, she is plain-looking but she later became popular in college and everyone liked her and where throwing themselves to go out with her which is what I bet everyone wishes would happen to them some day. (Hah!)

    The book was written mainly like a fanfiction and many younger kids like it so this book was mega Fanfiction paradise so that had a huge factor appeal. But too much FanFiction makes your stomach hurt like after eating too much Krispy Kreme.
    Always-Abby
    Always-Abby
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 10519
    Age : 615
    Village : Scorpion
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue90 / 10090 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-08-10

    AMP
    Natural: 63
    Power: 63
    Instinct: 64

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Always-Abby Sat Sep 27 2008, 15:34

    Titaniumxvx wrote:
    Always-Abby wrote:Twilight.
    Dear Lord, someone pass over the asprin.

    There are a bunch of reasons why I didn't like it. But, I flound a review on GoodReads that sums it all up:

    "1. Lack of characterization:
    Bella- Okay... I absolutely hated this girl. She was the worst female protagonist I have ever read about! She's stupid, shallow, selfish and just plain annoying! Not to mention she's pathetically dependent on Edward... I mean, come on, NO girl should be that dependent on a boy, not only is that pathetic, but it is very unhealthy. She was also a clumsy little damsel in distress who was dumb enough to get herself into situations that she couldn't get out of. I would have loved for Meyer to have given her a backbone, so she could have done something useful instead of whining and doing stupid, idiotic things that no remotely intelligent teenage girl would actually do. Not to mention the fact that she is apparently very "plain" looking... if that's the case then why are there several guys fawning over her? She's a Mary Sue, simple as that. And I hate Mary Sues.
    Edward- Okay, this boy is just way too possessive and stalkerish (it is not romantic of him to sneak into Bella's room and watch her sleep! It's creepy and wrong!) Oh, and "bad boys" usually, don't sit there and say "I'm dangerous, stay away" etc. all the time.... I also hated the fact that Bella described some part of his body every other page. It was completely UNNECESSARY!! Okay, we get the fact that he's hot, Bella... now MOVE ON!

    I could go on and on about all the characters... every single one of them was a flat, cardboard cut-out that did not seem realistic at all.

    2. Writing style:
    Purple Prose- Ew... to this... seriously, all the purple prose made me want to throw the book across the room. Enough said.

    3. Descriptions:
    I know I said up there that I got sick of reading about how gorgeous some part of Edward's body was every other paragraph... and if that wasn't bad enough... what's worse than is the fact that even with all that unnecessary description of him and everyone else (though mostly him, since Bella is that shallow) I still had a hard time picturing him or any of the characters in my head, for that matter. I also had a hard time picturing a lot of the setting and the action in my head as well. It's kind of sad really... there was so much description, you would think that everything (Edward especially) would be embedded into my brain, but no. That's what makes me wonder why so many fans find Edward so "hot", I never got a clear picture of him in my head to even begin to form an opinion about whether he was "hot" or not.

    4. Plot:
    Okay, the plot gets it's own category because it pissed me off so much. I mean, seriously... where was it?! It was nothing but sappy, gag worthy fluff between Edward and Bella until page 400 or so, when something finally happened. And, even then... it went by so fast and was not explained well at all. It seemed to me that Meyer just threw it in there, and it was only put there in the first place, so that she could point at it and say, "Look, there's a plot right there.", when people like me came around and said otherwise. But that's not a plot!! The plot should not take 400 pages to start! And no the whole "romance" between Bella and Edward is not the plot!!

    6. Plot holes
    The one thing that drove me absolutely CRAZY was the the fact that no one in the small town of Forks noticed that the Cullens never aged! And the "children" never graduated and went on to college. I mean, if they've been there for more than four years, than I'm assuming that someone would have noticed! I mean, the town could not be full of that many morons! Speaking of school, why in the world would they willingly choose to take high school over and over again? I know they need to "fit in", but seriously.. . that's just stupid... someone is bound to figure out sooner or later.

    Oh, I love the fans response to this, it usually goes like this: "Well it is a fictional book." That's a stupid reason. Just because it's a book with vampires doesn't mean it's exempt from having to be realistic and having glaring plot holes.

    7. Vampires
    Like I said before, I'm a big vampire fan. But, this book is an embarrassment to vampire fiction. The vampires are pathetic, sweet, innocent, almost "misunderstood" creatures. I know that Meyer has every right to create her own idea about vampires, but come on! Sparkling vampires?! Vegetarian vampires? That's just ridiculous! All the other myths about vampires are nonexistent. The whole sparkling vampire idea just seemed to be there because Meyer wanted a reason as to why the vampires could even walk around in the daylight to begin with. The idea was just a convenient way for her to write the vampires... who, were way too human like for my tastes. Oh, and not to mention the fact that they had all the good things when it came to being a vampire, but none of the bad things (ex: they don't burn in sunlight, they sparkle, they all have certain powers, but none of them have the bad things that come with them, etc.)

    I don't like my vampires to be blood thirsty monsters that kill everything in sight. But, I also don't want them to be so pathetic and innocent either. The only two vampiric qualities that are there are the ones that are well known among everyone: drinking blood and being immortal. Otherwise, the Cullens are disgustingly human like.

    I think the thing I have the problem with the most is the fact that Meyer has never seen any vampire movies/t.v. shows are read any vampire novels. If she had, I would have been able to respect her ideas more because at least then she would have done her research. It's quite obvious that she had no idea what she was doing when she created the vampires in this story.

    Where the vampires are concerned, this novel is an embarrassment to vampire/supernatural fiction.

    8. Messages
    I am somewhat appalled at the messages that this book sends out.. they are so anti-feminist, it's disgusting:
    1. It's perfectly okay to have no goals or aspirations or even an education, just get yourself a man and he'll take care of you.
    2. It's also perfectly okay to like someone because of their physical features... this is not love people, it's lust! They have nothing in common! He likes her because she smells nice and she likes him because he's hot.
    3. When you have several guys fawning over you pick the hottest one of them all because looks are so very important.
    4. It's okay if the guy you love sneaks into your bedroom and watches you sleep at night... that's completely normal and romantic... not the the least bit creepy or stalkerish.

    9. The Obsession:
    Well, this gets its own category, mostly because I just don't understand what all the obsession is over... it's a book, and a poorly written one at that. I run across girls all the time arguing over who Edward "belongs" to... it's pathetic and kind of scary. He's a book character... he doesn't belong to anyone, but Meyer, since she's the one that created him.

    This was obviously a fulfillment story that I would expect a preteen to write on her livejournal. This is not a book I would expect a thirty something year old women with a
    college education to write and actually attempt and then succeed in getting published. And, it was a degree in English... seriously, I would have expected much better from someone who had that degree... since she spent college studying books and analyzing them etc. you would think that she would know how to write one the proper way...

    Meyer could have made this book great, but no... instead she took the easy way out: a cliched, simple, overused plot and added vampires to it(as if that made it any different).

    Honestly, I've read better over on fictionpress.com... and that's really sad, because most of the authors over there are between the ages of 14 and 26 and are amateurs in the field. Maybe, if Meyer had posted this up there first, it would have been a much better story because the good writers over there would have set her straight. Maybe then, I would have been able to get through the novel, because it might have actually been good!

    And, oh just for the record... Twilight is NOT the next Harry Potter, nor is it better than Harry Potter... I say that not only because JK Rowling actually has talent, but also because they are in completely different genres and can't really be compared.

    Though, it does make me sick to see Harry Potter even mentioned in the same sentence as this piece of crap... (unfortunately, that couldn't be avoided in this review) and it's an insult to JK Rowling to have her amazing writing compared to the horrible writing of Stephenie Meyer..."

    That was a monster post, Abby, just huge. I have to give you props because they were insightful and cutting. Liked em!

    I wish Meyer would have stopped after the 1st book, Twilight. The rest seemed to ruin everything, I mean, there is only so much fiction that someone can take. I read Twilight because our teacher initially asked everyone to read it for extra credit and I admit, I liked it, I was left with a warm feeling of contentness like “Wow, vampires. Interesting”. The next three books were next to impossible. Sometimes, sequels should just stop somewhere. So I give it a 5.

    Ms. Steph made it into a money-making cow machine putting book after book out, not paying attention to the less than lived up to books or the wearied fans. That is what I call selling out ethics. I wish she hadn't done that. Such a day ruiner.

    My favorite part of your whole speech was that there is only so much you can hear about Edward. “Edward’s hair, Edward’s eyes…so gold…so bronze, so beautiful! I’m lost in them! I look so plain! So gorgeous! I look like such a simpleton standing next to him. I’m cutting myself out of the picture now!” (Ah…I thought that was hilarious. Simply hilarious)

    The protagonist, Bella, is based of Stephanie Meyer, I am not even kidding. You take a look at Meyer, and that is her exact description of Bella. Yes, if you look at her picture, she is plain-looking but she later became popular in college and everyone liked her and where throwing themselves to go out with her which is what I bet everyone wishes would happen to them some day. (Hah!)

    The book was written mainly like a fanfiction and many younger kids like it so this book was mega Fanfiction paradise so that had a huge factor appeal. But too much FanFiction makes your stomach hurt like after eating too much Krispy Kreme.
    Heh, it was, wasn't it?
    But, I didn't write the review. Someone else did.
    Props to them, actually, because they covered a lot of the problems in the book.
    Titaniumxvx
    Titaniumxvx
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 21997
    Age : 31
    Village : Scorpion
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue100 / 100100 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2007-08-16

    AMP
    Natural: 5
    Power:
    Instinct: 5

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Titaniumxvx Sat Sep 27 2008, 15:38

    You didn't write it? I thought you did and was like, "this person is mad at critiquing" What a dastardly long post that was!

    Claps at putting it up them, pulling no punches, true, but they certainly nailed it!
    Always-Abby
    Always-Abby
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 10519
    Age : 615
    Village : Scorpion
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue90 / 10090 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-08-10

    AMP
    Natural: 63
    Power: 63
    Instinct: 64

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Always-Abby Sat Sep 27 2008, 15:47

    Oh, I can critique pretty madly. But, that certain one really caught my eye so I put it up. I actually didn't notice how long it was ._.

    Hum...I guess I could say that I didn't like Lucas by Kevin Brooks either. It's actually still sitting in my stack of books with a bookmark inside of it from a few months ago. It started out pretty well, and I guess I just lost interest in it. Maybe I'll try reading again someday...
    KarateKeyaQ
    KarateKeyaQ
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 41152
    Age : 14
    Village : Cops
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue2 / 1002 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2007-10-30

    AMP
    Natural: 2
    Power: 0
    Instinct: 2

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by KarateKeyaQ Thu Mar 12 2009, 00:02

    Odd Thomas by Dean Koontz.

    I tried, I honestly tried to finish it...but it's horrible. I can't get into it.

    I read the husband by Dean, hated it. Thought he was a bad writer.

    But then I read "Watchers" and I loved it so my view on him changed a bit. I started to get some of his books.

    I got Oddthomas, and he became a bad writer again .__. What is up with his guy? Is he bad or good? I hate him.
    SickSelfishSyQo
    SickSelfishSyQo
    Citizen


    Number of posts : 21639
    Age : 57
    What's up Tab : I'm so ninja, I cut my pizza with a sword.
    Fanclubs : Soul Eater
    Village : Scorpion
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue40 / 10040 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-11-26

    AMP
    Natural: 37
    Power: Frostbite
    Instinct: 43

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by SickSelfishSyQo Thu Mar 12 2009, 02:26

    quater wrote:
    Meika-Chan wrote:
    knssquad wrote:
    Meika-Chan wrote:
    knssquad wrote:WHy don't they just let us read Edgar Allen Poe stuff?

    I can't remember the name of one of his plays. But the beating heart under the floor, was great >:D
    ZOMG Edgar Allen Poe is amazing >3

    xD Power to the dark poetry!

    XD Much better than those generic happy endings!!!
    I know!

    I loved the one when the dude brought his friend to some chamber and locked him up in there, that one was super cool too!

    I just referenced that one ^_^

    The story you are thinking of is The Cask of Amantillado. The author brings a freind downstairs to show him a cask of some good wine, he then encases him in a little space - freshly built!

    The giver?? Was that the one where there was no color??

    To kill a mocking bird...*sigh* Never finished it. I hated it. I may have liked it better if I wasn't bitter about having to write this huge thesis paper on it. I didn't even finish it, yet I found myself writing a paper on it for myself and a paper for someone else. (Egads, why did these people trust me??)

    The two books that I was forced to read by various schools that were brain-meltingly sucky are; The Pearl, and this book I was supposed to read in like 5th grade called Sarah Plain and Tall. I didn't finish that one either.
    Always-Abby
    Always-Abby
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 10519
    Age : 615
    Village : Scorpion
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue90 / 10090 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-08-10

    AMP
    Natural: 63
    Power: 63
    Instinct: 64

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Always-Abby Thu Mar 12 2009, 16:11

    Roll Of Thunder, Hear My Cry by something Mildred.

    This book made me want to rip out my eyes and throw them into a fire after melting my brain into soup.

    Okay, so it starts off with the little kiddies walking to school and the younger whining about his clothes being dirty from all the dust. Then, the annoying spindly kid comes in and tells them about some guy being burned to death (wow, what a wonderful thing to say in front of a 6 and 9 year old!). Blah blah blah, they go to school, yippee. Later, the spindly kid decides that he wants to rob a store with these two other losers! I wonder how that even contributes to the invisible plot!
    Finally, the invisible plot SUPPOSEDLY comes in at the second to last chapter. But, really, there wasn't a plot at all. Just a book full of people living an unexciting life. Whoo.
    Oh, and the spindly kid probably died at the end. Even though no one even liked him. Whoo!

    All in all, I learned that there was a such thing as being "bored to death".
    CrispinFreemanWatcher16
    CrispinFreemanWatcher16
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 37490
    Age : 33
    Fanclubs : NaruHina & SasuSaku FC,WOTN Veteran Princes
    Village : Military
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue98 / 10098 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2007-08-16

    AMP
    Natural: 11
    Power: 0
    Instinct: 11

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by CrispinFreemanWatcher16 Sat Mar 14 2009, 12:49

    i remember that book Roll Of thunder, hear my cry.

    one of the worst books i've read is the Crucible
    CLAIRVOYANTdisease
    CLAIRVOYANTdisease
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 61517
    Age : 461
    What's up Tab : The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Ajqwx0
    Fanclubs : Neji & Kiba
    Village : Dragon
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue100 / 100100 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-10-26

    AMP
    Natural: 700
    Power: 700
    Instinct: 700

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by CLAIRVOYANTdisease Sat Mar 14 2009, 13:07

    I haven't really read that many books I hate surprisingly. And if I do hate them its only because they are far too cyptic or far too basic.

    Loved your post on Twilight though, Abby. I just read it. I completely agree with it too :3
    SickSelfishSyQo
    SickSelfishSyQo
    Citizen


    Number of posts : 21639
    Age : 57
    What's up Tab : I'm so ninja, I cut my pizza with a sword.
    Fanclubs : Soul Eater
    Village : Scorpion
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue40 / 10040 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-11-26

    AMP
    Natural: 37
    Power: Frostbite
    Instinct: 43

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by SickSelfishSyQo Sat Mar 14 2009, 17:15

    CrispinFreemanWatcher16 wrote:i remember that book Roll Of thunder, hear my cry.

    one of the worst books i've read is the Crucible

    Yeah, the crucilbe was pretty terrible.
    PeinQAkatsuki
    PeinQAkatsuki
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 27316
    Age : 29
    What's up Tab : Homie Purp && Homie Blue: Ghetto since 2009
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Ightning
    PeinQ & ThiCup: Non-photogenic buddies~ :D
    Fanclubs : Deidara FC, Kabuto FC, Jesus Freaks club, FMA FC, Tobi FC, Soul Eater FC :D, Death Note FC :D
    Village : Mockingbird
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue100 / 100100 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-01-25

    AMP
    Natural: 2
    Power:
    Instinct: 2

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by PeinQAkatsuki Sat Mar 14 2009, 20:53

    I never really liked the Twilight series.

    Okay that's a lie I liked it for a while, but then EVERY SINGLE TEENAGE GIRL AT MY SCHOOL became a fangirl of either the series or of Edward. ROBERT PATTERSON ISN'T THAT HOT FOLKS.

    Really, I'm more of a 'Team Jacob' person, and I only read the books for the werewolves. Ever since Dracula, almost every story with some gothic title has a vampire in it. Except for the Bitten series, which I think has a werewolf, but I may be mistaken.

    I have no idea what book I posted that I didn't like, and if it was Twilight, than here's a more in depth description of WHY i don't like it.
    Ikazu Raiken
    Ikazu Raiken
    Citizen


    Male
    Number of posts : 1479
    Age : 283
    Village : Military
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue3 / 1003 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-12-15

    AMP
    Natural: 0
    Power: 0
    Instinct: 0

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Ikazu Raiken Sun Mar 15 2009, 04:07

    Hm, well Twilight but i haven't read that. :/

    I told mom too buy it today, so she can read it, though i doubt she will, the whole "Sparkling Vampire" thing wasn't very appealing to her.
    Always-Abby
    Always-Abby
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 10519
    Age : 615
    Village : Scorpion
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue90 / 10090 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-08-10

    AMP
    Natural: 63
    Power: 63
    Instinct: 64

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Always-Abby Sun Mar 15 2009, 09:15

    CLAIRVOYANTdisease wrote:I haven't really read that many books I hate surprisingly. And if I do hate them its only because they are far too cyptic or far too basic.

    Loved your post on Twilight though, Abby. I just read it. I completely agree with it too :3
    Haha, whoever made the review was a genious. Covered everything wrong about it x3
    Which is why I posted it.
    PeinQAkatsuki
    PeinQAkatsuki
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 27316
    Age : 29
    What's up Tab : Homie Purp && Homie Blue: Ghetto since 2009
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Ightning
    PeinQ & ThiCup: Non-photogenic buddies~ :D
    Fanclubs : Deidara FC, Kabuto FC, Jesus Freaks club, FMA FC, Tobi FC, Soul Eater FC :D, Death Note FC :D
    Village : Mockingbird
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue100 / 100100 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-01-25

    AMP
    Natural: 2
    Power:
    Instinct: 2

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by PeinQAkatsuki Sun Mar 15 2009, 15:50

    Ikazu Raiken wrote:Hm, well Twilight but i haven't read that. :/

    I told mom too buy it today, so she can read it, though i doubt she will, the whole "Sparkling Vampire" thing wasn't very appealing to her.
    The movie sucked too. It left out half the book :/
    KarateKeyaQ
    KarateKeyaQ
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 41152
    Age : 14
    Village : Cops
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue2 / 1002 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2007-10-30

    AMP
    Natural: 2
    Power: 0
    Instinct: 2

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by KarateKeyaQ Sun Mar 15 2009, 16:08

    I vote Jacob too Pein.

    Him and James are smexayyy ;]

    I hate the books though and the movie was horrible. I never got into the actual storyline.

    I just like Taylor Launtner and whoever played James <3~
    Ikazu Raiken
    Ikazu Raiken
    Citizen


    Male
    Number of posts : 1479
    Age : 283
    Village : Military
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue3 / 1003 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-12-15

    AMP
    Natural: 0
    Power: 0
    Instinct: 0

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Ikazu Raiken Sun Mar 15 2009, 16:08

    ...

    Interesting. :/
    CLAIRVOYANTdisease
    CLAIRVOYANTdisease
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 61517
    Age : 461
    What's up Tab : The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Ajqwx0
    Fanclubs : Neji & Kiba
    Village : Dragon
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue100 / 100100 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-10-26

    AMP
    Natural: 700
    Power: 700
    Instinct: 700

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by CLAIRVOYANTdisease Sun Mar 15 2009, 16:25

    KarateKeyaQ wrote:I vote Jacob too Pein.

    Him and James are smexayyy ;]

    I hate the books though and the movie was horrible. I never got into the actual storyline.

    I just like Taylor Launtner and whoever played James <3~

    Cam Gigandet ^_^
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Guest Sun Mar 15 2009, 16:52

    Aichu wrote:...We don't read a lot of books at school :/ The kids in my school are to stupid to read books. Most illiterate province in Canada, yo. So I can't say there were too many books I hated. In fact, I absolutely adored Lord of the Flies and the Pigman. Those were both excellent books.

    The Outsiders...it wasn't terrible or anything, but you can definitely tell the author is young and inexperience. Actually, the movie was better. Which is sacrilege. But true.

    Cue for Treason...wtf? I thought it was supposed to take place during the medieval times, but the characters were acting like a bunch of modern teenagers! And the ZOMG big plot twist where the dude turned out to be a girl was so overused in its gender and extremely predictable. And the kids talking to Queen Elizabeth...give me a break.

    Romeo and Juliet. It's really over-rated. They were stupid. Enough said.

    Worst book I've ever had to read in school? The hatchet by Gary Paulsen. In the fourth grade. That book literally tramatized me so badly I begged my mom to call the teacher and tell her not to force us to read it.

    I remember that Aichu.
    Actually I quite like the hatchet, it was a pretty good book
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Guest Sun Mar 15 2009, 16:53

    CrispinFreemanWatcher16 wrote:A separate piece

    Loved that book, read that earlier this year
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Guest Sun Mar 15 2009, 16:53

    CrispinFreemanWatcher16 wrote:I luved the outsiders and the giver.

    I kinda hated To Kill a Mocking Bird.

    I found to kill a mockingbird quite nice even with all the essays and questions and everything on it wthat my english teacher made us do
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Guest Sun Mar 15 2009, 16:54

    quater wrote:
    Aichu wrote:
    quater wrote:
    Aichu wrote:The outsider's was an interesting story, and I did enjoy it, but it wasn't very well written. Like that scene with the fire. I think it went something like "a burning piece of wood hit him on the back" ._.

    Q. I am going to shoot you for that statement.

    To Kill a Mockingbird was pretty good- a little drawn out at times, but the ending was awesome.

    I don't care. Books are a lot of work and I don't enjoy them more then movies most of the time. I love how people always go on about how books are supposed to be better because the author works so hard to use imagery but the Producers work hard don't they to make an acceptable image. So I don't really think it's fair.

    Two words: Eragon Movie.

    I don't care how much effort they put into it. There is really no excuse for that kind of rubbish.

    Okay? So you didn't like a movie? Eragon the book was pretty bad too not much to work with.

    I mean, what's your point? I thought the Lord of The Rings movies were way better then the books so there? ^_^

    Eragon book was okay, only like 7/10
    I found the Lord of the rings books to be better, the movies didn't have tom bombadill or Glorfindel
    PeinQAkatsuki
    PeinQAkatsuki
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 27316
    Age : 29
    What's up Tab : Homie Purp && Homie Blue: Ghetto since 2009
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Ightning
    PeinQ & ThiCup: Non-photogenic buddies~ :D
    Fanclubs : Deidara FC, Kabuto FC, Jesus Freaks club, FMA FC, Tobi FC, Soul Eater FC :D, Death Note FC :D
    Village : Mockingbird
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue100 / 100100 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-01-25

    AMP
    Natural: 2
    Power:
    Instinct: 2

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by PeinQAkatsuki Sun Mar 15 2009, 17:16

    KarateKeyaQ wrote:I vote Jacob too Pein.

    Him and James are smexayyy ;]

    I hate the books though and the movie was horrible. I never got into the actual storyline.

    I just like Taylor Launtner and whoever played James <3~
    Jacob's amazing! Seth is too. Actually... the werewolves and James were the best of those books :/
    PeinQAkatsuki
    PeinQAkatsuki
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 27316
    Age : 29
    What's up Tab : Homie Purp && Homie Blue: Ghetto since 2009
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Ightning
    PeinQ & ThiCup: Non-photogenic buddies~ :D
    Fanclubs : Deidara FC, Kabuto FC, Jesus Freaks club, FMA FC, Tobi FC, Soul Eater FC :D, Death Note FC :D
    Village : Mockingbird
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue100 / 100100 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-01-25

    AMP
    Natural: 2
    Power:
    Instinct: 2

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by PeinQAkatsuki Sun Mar 15 2009, 17:17

    amaterasu wrote:
    quater wrote:
    Aichu wrote:
    quater wrote:
    Aichu wrote:The outsider's was an interesting story, and I did enjoy it, but it wasn't very well written. Like that scene with the fire. I think it went something like "a burning piece of wood hit him on the back" ._.

    Q. I am going to shoot you for that statement.

    To Kill a Mockingbird was pretty good- a little drawn out at times, but the ending was awesome.

    I don't care. Books are a lot of work and I don't enjoy them more then movies most of the time. I love how people always go on about how books are supposed to be better because the author works so hard to use imagery but the Producers work hard don't they to make an acceptable image. So I don't really think it's fair.

    Two words: Eragon Movie.

    I don't care how much effort they put into it. There is really no excuse for that kind of rubbish.

    Okay? So you didn't like a movie? Eragon the book was pretty bad too not much to work with.

    I mean, what's your point? I thought the Lord of The Rings movies were way better then the books so there? ^_^

    Eragon book was okay, only like 7/10
    I found the Lord of the rings books to be better, the movies didn't have tom bombadill or Glorfindel
    I loved the book Eragon, but I got bored in chapter five of eldest :/
    avatar
    Guest
    Guest


    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Guest Sun Mar 15 2009, 17:20

    PeinQAkatsuki wrote:
    amaterasu wrote:
    quater wrote:
    Aichu wrote:
    quater wrote:
    Aichu wrote:The outsider's was an interesting story, and I did enjoy it, but it wasn't very well written. Like that scene with the fire. I think it went something like "a burning piece of wood hit him on the back" ._.

    Q. I am going to shoot you for that statement.

    To Kill a Mockingbird was pretty good- a little drawn out at times, but the ending was awesome.

    I don't care. Books are a lot of work and I don't enjoy them more then movies most of the time. I love how people always go on about how books are supposed to be better because the author works so hard to use imagery but the Producers work hard don't they to make an acceptable image. So I don't really think it's fair.

    Two words: Eragon Movie.

    I don't care how much effort they put into it. There is really no excuse for that kind of rubbish.

    Okay? So you didn't like a movie? Eragon the book was pretty bad too not much to work with.

    I mean, what's your point? I thought the Lord of The Rings movies were way better then the books so there? ^_^

    Eragon book was okay, only like 7/10
    I found the Lord of the rings books to be better, the movies didn't have tom bombadill or Glorfindel
    I loved the book Eragon, but I got bored in chapter five of eldest :/

    I never read brisingr except for the first couple pages.
    PeinQAkatsuki
    PeinQAkatsuki
    Citizen


    Female
    Number of posts : 27316
    Age : 29
    What's up Tab : Homie Purp && Homie Blue: Ghetto since 2009
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Ightning
    PeinQ & ThiCup: Non-photogenic buddies~ :D
    Fanclubs : Deidara FC, Kabuto FC, Jesus Freaks club, FMA FC, Tobi FC, Soul Eater FC :D, Death Note FC :D
    Village : Mockingbird
    Happiness bar :
    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Left_bar_bleue100 / 100100 / 100The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Right_bar_bleue

    Registration date : 2008-01-25

    AMP
    Natural: 2
    Power:
    Instinct: 2

    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by PeinQAkatsuki Sun Mar 15 2009, 17:39

    amaterasu wrote:
    PeinQAkatsuki wrote:
    amaterasu wrote:
    quater wrote:
    Aichu wrote:
    quater wrote:
    Aichu wrote:The outsider's was an interesting story, and I did enjoy it, but it wasn't very well written. Like that scene with the fire. I think it went something like "a burning piece of wood hit him on the back" ._.

    Q. I am going to shoot you for that statement.

    To Kill a Mockingbird was pretty good- a little drawn out at times, but the ending was awesome.

    I don't care. Books are a lot of work and I don't enjoy them more then movies most of the time. I love how people always go on about how books are supposed to be better because the author works so hard to use imagery but the Producers work hard don't they to make an acceptable image. So I don't really think it's fair.

    Two words: Eragon Movie.

    I don't care how much effort they put into it. There is really no excuse for that kind of rubbish.

    Okay? So you didn't like a movie? Eragon the book was pretty bad too not much to work with.

    I mean, what's your point? I thought the Lord of The Rings movies were way better then the books so there? ^_^

    Eragon book was okay, only like 7/10
    I found the Lord of the rings books to be better, the movies didn't have tom bombadill or Glorfindel
    I loved the book Eragon, but I got bored in chapter five of eldest :/

    I never read brisingr except for the first couple pages.
    My friend Lane likes that book a lot :/

    Sponsored content


    The Worse book you have ever read - Page 5 Empty Re: The Worse book you have ever read

    Post by Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Fri Nov 15 2024, 17:47