Long Term Jutsu

Should long term attacking jutsu such as
burns, choking/drowning/suffocation, electricution, frostbite, etc.,
be allowed and if so what limitations should be placed on them?

Not really for it.

Things get confusing. And why can't a choke be counted as one attack? I mean honestly?

yeah nothing that lasts for more than one attack should be allowed becasue then you would then have to consider whats a reasonable amount of dmg per turn ,its jsut too much trouble i say ban all multiple trun attacks

Well, and why can't you just continue the attack?

Say he evades my Mutliple Sand arrow barrage?

So I just continue it to the next "Turn"

quater wrote:Well, and why can't you just continue the attack?

Say he evades my Mutliple Sand arrow barrage?

So I just continue it to the next "Turn"

sounds a bit better but the point is people are saying
stuff like this
*attacks with jutsu*
jutsu deals 5 damage per turn and lasts for 5 turns

if you have a long term jtusu.....it should only last 3 turns max and do a maximum of 5 damage....therefore people cant spam them...and limit them according to end's shielding effectr

Wrong, there should be none of these jutsu. They do nothing but confuse the field.

I will agree actually. It does become quite confusing and it would cause much more trouble then we are already going to have.

true but think about it if you have limited someone to only 15 damage a hit technically then this type of move is illegal because there jutsu is allowing more damage

mmm...agreed....is the vote unanimous...?

i guess if our talking about banning the use of long term jutsu

yeah......all in favor of banning long term jutsu?

!!!

I

Aye* actually. But yes i agree they should be banned.

All Jutsu that have long term effects are banned (Simple summary)