Political Affiliation

quater wrote:

Yuriishi_Yhun wrote:

quater wrote:

Yuriishi_Yhun wrote:

quater wrote:

Yuriishi_Yhun wrote:

quater wrote:

Yuriishi_Yhun wrote:Libertarian.
Though I'm more libertarian/conservative. ^_^
Yes, I know enough about politics to know that. xD

I am Conservative borderline libertarian.

I can't get over things like abortion and legal drugs or how Bob Marr hates the war in iraq though. Plus Ronald Raegan was to neat!

So, I figured out that my Political Theory teacher is libertarian. I was a border-line, myself, but enough to the side of libertarian that I got called one by that quiz. :P

Libertarians have a great philosophy and are right. Keep government small.

But again, they mess me up with their secularism and anti morals.

A few of those questions lumped too many different topics into one question, which swayed my answers, some. Definately not anti-moral or secular, though.
I can't make up my mind as far as making drugs and stuff illegal. Making alcohol illegal didn't help any, it made it worse. But drugs do the same thing and are (oddly enough) more healthy for you than alcohol.
So... I'm confused. ^_^

Yeah but nowadays drunk driving is a real problem. Bet it wasn't when it was illegal.

And I don't want to know people can drive someday drugged. Q's against Drug Driving!

Yay! :D
It should definately be illegal to drive drunk/drugged, but I'm not so sure about using them in the first place. *shrug*

Also agreed.

Plus places have the "Town drunkee" and we know alcoholics can go overkill. But since druggies have to "hide it" to some degree I think if we made drugs legal all we'd end up doing is multiplying Town Druggers and stuff. Also, younger kids will be more susceptible to it and become addicted.

In fact, I can't name one good thing except people in jail will get out. But since they ARE breaking the law, even if they disagree with the law, why should they be let out? If I get sent to jail for not wearing my seatbelt, no matter how dumb that law is, doesn't mean we should let me out because I still broke it.

TheFirstKnight wrote:since, both yuri and q are libertarians, then shouldn't your candidate of choice be Ron Paul?

Yuriishi_Yhun wrote:He's not exactly an option, now, is he?
McCain's the best bet.
But then, neither of us can vote, so it doesn't matter, too much.

seshimazi wrote:

TheFirstKnight wrote:since, both yuri and q are
libertarians, then shouldn't your candidate of choice be Ron
Paul?

Q is Conservative
and if your a libertarian you'd prolly pick Bob Barr since hes libertarian

TheFirstKnight wrote:then, all the more reason to support Ron Paul.

seshimazi wrote:

TheFirstKnight wrote:since, both yuri and q are
libertarians, then shouldn't your candidate of choice be Ron
Paul?

Q is Conservative
and if your a libertarian you'd prolly pick Bob Barr since hes libertarian

Ron Paul was the only serious libertarin contender.

seshimazi wrote:

TheFirstKnight wrote:then, all the more reason to support Ron Paul.

seshimazi wrote:

TheFirstKnight wrote:since, both yuri and q are
libertarians, then shouldn't your candidate of choice be Ron
Paul?

Q is Conservative
and if your a libertarian you'd prolly pick Bob Barr since hes libertarian

Ron Paul was the only serious libertarin contender.

Ron paul is a republican dude.

TheFirstKnight wrote:

seshimazi wrote:

TheFirstKnight wrote:then, all the more reason to support Ron Paul.

seshimazi wrote:

TheFirstKnight wrote:since, both yuri and q are
libertarians, then shouldn't your candidate of choice be Ron
Paul?

Q is Conservative
and if your a libertarian you'd prolly pick Bob Barr since hes libertarian

Ron Paul was the only serious libertarin contender.

Ron paul is a republican dude.

he runs for the republican party, but he has more libertarian policies.

TheFirstKnight wrote:

Yuriishi_Yhun wrote:He's not exactly an option, now, is he?
McCain's the best bet.
But then, neither of us can vote, so it doesn't matter, too much.

then, all the more reason to support Ron Paul.

seshimazi wrote:Well i dont pay attention to him because hes in repub party and he dropped out of election so it doesnt matter and Bob Barr is The libertarian Candidate of choice.

TheFirstKnight wrote:

seshimazi wrote:Well i dont pay attention to him because hes in repub party and he dropped out of election so it doesnt matter and Bob Barr is The libertarian Candidate of choice.

Ron Paul at least had a slight chance of winning.

TheFirstKnight wrote:since, both yuri and q are libertarians, then shouldn't your candidate of choice be Ron Paul?

seshimazi wrote:

TheFirstKnight wrote:

seshimazi wrote:Well i dont pay attention to him because hes in repub party and he dropped out of election so it doesnt matter and Bob Barr is The libertarian Candidate of choice.

Ron Paul at least had a slight chance of winning.

Well whatever Dude it doesnt Matter if hes not in it anymore

quater wrote:I'm afraid I am an ultra conservative sir.

Bob
Barr is useless. Especially how he berates the war. He has 0 shots at
winning. You'd be as soon as to cast your vote for Nader.

quater wrote:

TheFirstKnight wrote:since, both yuri and q are libertarians, then shouldn't your candidate of choice be Ron Paul?

I'm afraid I am an ultra conservative sir.

Bob Barr is useless. Especially how he berates the war. He has 0 shots at winning. You'd be as soon as to cast your vote for Nader.

TheFirstKnight wrote:

seshimazi wrote:

TheFirstKnight wrote:

seshimazi wrote:Well i dont pay attention to him because hes in repub party and he dropped out of election so it doesnt matter and Bob Barr is The libertarian Candidate of choice.

Ron Paul at least had a slight chance of winning.

Well whatever Dude it doesnt Matter if hes not in it anymore

well it doesn't matter now does it? You can't vote.

quater wrote:I'm afraid I am an ultra conservative sir.

Bob
Barr is useless. Especially how he berates the war. He has 0 shots at
winning. You'd be as soon as to cast your vote for Nader.

oops, you only said you were borderline libertarian.

Yuriishi_Yhun wrote:

TheFirstKnight wrote:

seshimazi wrote:

TheFirstKnight wrote:

seshimazi wrote:Well i dont pay attention to him because hes in repub party and he dropped out of election so it doesnt matter and Bob Barr is The libertarian Candidate of choice.

Ron Paul at least had a slight chance of winning.

Well whatever Dude it doesnt Matter if hes not in it anymore

well it doesn't matter now does it? You can't vote.

quater wrote:I'm afraid I am an ultra conservative sir.

Bob
Barr is useless. Especially how he berates the war. He has 0 shots at
winning. You'd be as soon as to cast your vote for Nader.

oops, you only said you were borderline libertarian.

And I said that I was libertarian bordering on the line of conservative.

seshimazi wrote:well atleast no one here is a statist

seshimazi wrote:well atleast no one here is a statist

TheFirstKnight wrote:

seshimazi wrote:well atleast no one here is a statist