Beach

Sayomi Hatake wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:hey .....

hi im messing with everyone trying to get them to solve paradoxes

lol, that sound like fun even tho im really bad at solving em

well i kinda gave them a hard one right away there so much fun look in my spoiler you will see one ^^

Give us another Shu.

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:hey .....

hi im messing with everyone trying to get them to solve paradoxes

lol, that sound like fun even tho im really bad at solving em

well i kinda gave them a hard one right away there so much fun look in my spoiler you will see one ^^

thats crazy ....

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote: you see this paradox has been solved and yes sori we do move but see the person that proposed this paradox is trying to state that we infact dont that all motion is jsut a illusion

which is inturn, a load of baloney.

i hope that person was consealed in a safe white padded focility.

no he wasnt he actually thought up 4 paradoxes total

his mom must be so proud.

The great Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea (born sometime between 495 and 480 B.C.) proposed
four paradoxes in an effort to challenge
the accepted notions of space and time that he encountered in various philosophical circles. His
paradoxes confounded mathematicians for centuries, and it wasn't until Cantor's development (in the 1860's and
1870's) of the
theory of infinite
sets that the paradoxes could be fully resolved.
Zeno's paradoxes focus on the relation of the discrete to the continuous, an issue that is at the
very heart of mathematics. Here we will present the first of his famous four paradoxes.

Zeno's first paradox attacks the notion held by many philosophers of his day that space was
infinitely divisible, and that motion was therefore continuous.

motion is continuous.

lol that is true but the point is to prove why you know its continuious becasue its not necessarly about motion its about if you keep dividing the total distance and have a set time for each is it possible to ever reach the goal in the original set time

NejiFan wrote: Give us another Shu.

ok ill give you a easy logical one



The Liar Paradox is among the simplest of paradoxes. It can be
traced back at least as far as Eubulides of Miletus, a fourth-century
B.C. Greek philosopher.
Eubulides’ version of the paradox is this: A man says that he is lying; is what he says true or false?

I hate writing resumes

Sayomi Hatake wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:hey .....

hi im messing with everyone trying to get them to solve paradoxes

lol, that sound like fun even tho im really bad at solving em

well i kinda gave them a hard one right away there so much fun look in my spoiler you will see one ^^

thats crazy ....

but did you look at the guy or jsut the image look carefully the paradox isnt how they keep replicating the picture but how they do that with it being only one man

Sayomi Hatake wrote:I hate writing resumes

really same but i love paradoxes

shugo wrote:

NejiFan wrote: Give us another Shu.

ok ill give you a easy logical one



The Liar Paradox is among the simplest of paradoxes. It can be
traced back at least as far as Eubulides of Miletus, a fourth-century
B.C. Greek philosopher.
Eubulides’ version of the paradox is this: A man says that he is lying; is what he says true or false?

nooo my brain is going to explode lol ... I say hes lying

shugo wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote: you see this paradox has been solved and yes sori we do move but see the person that proposed this paradox is trying to state that we infact dont that all motion is jsut a illusion

which is inturn, a load of baloney.

i hope that person was consealed in a safe white padded focility.

no he wasnt he actually thought up 4 paradoxes total

his mom must be so proud.

The great Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea (born sometime between 495 and 480 B.C.) proposed
four paradoxes in an effort to challenge
the accepted notions of space and time that he encountered in various philosophical circles. His
paradoxes confounded mathematicians for centuries, and it wasn't until Cantor's development (in the 1860's and
1870's) of the
theory of infinite
sets that the paradoxes could be fully resolved.
Zeno's paradoxes focus on the relation of the discrete to the continuous, an issue that is at the
very heart of mathematics. Here we will present the first of his famous four paradoxes.

Zeno's first paradox attacks the notion held by many philosophers of his day that space was
infinitely divisible, and that motion was therefore continuous.

motion is continuous.

lol that is true but the point is to prove why you know its continuious becasue its not necessarly about motion its about if you keep dividing the total distance and have a set time for each is it possible to ever reach the goal in the original set time

i dont care all to much about that.
my point about that is everything continues to moves unless there is something there to stop the momentum.

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:hey .....

hi im messing with everyone trying to get them to solve paradoxes

lol, that sound like fun even tho im really bad at solving em

well i kinda gave them a hard one right away there so much fun look in my spoiler you will see one ^^

thats crazy ....

but did you look at the guy or jsut the image look carefully the paradox isnt how they keep replicating the picture but how they do that with it being only one man

ya I know it makes my head spin

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:I hate writing resumes

really same but i love paradoxes

I gotta write one so i can get a job with dreamwoks studios!!!

shugo wrote:

NejiFan wrote: Give us another Shu.

ok ill give you a easy logical one



The Liar Paradox is among the simplest of paradoxes. It can be
traced back at least as far as Eubulides of Miletus, a fourth-century
B.C. Greek philosopher.
Eubulides’ version of the paradox is this: A man says that he is lying; is what he says true or false?

why the hell would someone say they are lying but werent?
all these paradox peeps are nutty.

shugo wrote:

NejiFan wrote: Give us another Shu.

ok ill give you a easy logical one



The Liar Paradox is among the simplest of paradoxes. It can be
traced back at least as far as Eubulides of Miletus, a fourth-century
B.C. Greek philosopher.
Eubulides’ version of the paradox is this: A man says that he is lying; is what he says true or false?

False! Because by saying he's lying, he's telling the truth!

...I think. @.@

Sayomi Hatake wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:I hate writing resumes

really same but i love paradoxes

I gotta write one so i can get a job with dreamwoks studios!!!

HLOYSMOKES youd be my hero, they helped produce my favorite movie

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote: you see this paradox has been solved and yes sori we do move but see the person that proposed this paradox is trying to state that we infact dont that all motion is jsut a illusion

which is inturn, a load of baloney.

i hope that person was consealed in a safe white padded focility.

no he wasnt he actually thought up 4 paradoxes total

his mom must be so proud.

The great Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea (born sometime between 495 and 480 B.C.) proposed
four paradoxes in an effort to challenge
the accepted notions of space and time that he encountered in various philosophical circles. His
paradoxes confounded mathematicians for centuries, and it wasn't until Cantor's development (in the 1860's and
1870's) of the
theory of infinite
sets that the paradoxes could be fully resolved.
Zeno's paradoxes focus on the relation of the discrete to the continuous, an issue that is at the
very heart of mathematics. Here we will present the first of his famous four paradoxes.

Zeno's first paradox attacks the notion held by many philosophers of his day that space was
infinitely divisible, and that motion was therefore continuous.

motion is continuous.

lol that is true but the point is to prove why you know its continuious becasue its not necessarly about motion its about if you keep dividing the total distance and have a set time for each is it possible to ever reach the goal in the original set time

i dont care all to much about that.
my point about that is everything continues to moves unless there is something there to stop the momentum.

like the theory of an object in motion stays in motion unless acted apon by an outside fores??

Sayomi Hatake wrote:

shugo wrote:

NejiFan wrote: Give us another Shu.

ok ill give you a easy logical one



The Liar Paradox is among the simplest of paradoxes. It can be
traced back at least as far as Eubulides of Miletus, a fourth-century
B.C. Greek philosopher.
Eubulides’ version of the paradox is this: A man says that he is lying; is what he says true or false?

nooo my brain is going to explode lol ... I say hes lying

you sure

Sayomi Hatake wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

shugo wrote: you see this paradox has been solved and yes sori we do move but see the person that proposed this paradox is trying to state that we infact dont that all motion is jsut a illusion

which is inturn, a load of baloney.

i hope that person was consealed in a safe white padded focility.

no he wasnt he actually thought up 4 paradoxes total

his mom must be so proud.

The great Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea (born sometime between 495 and 480 B.C.) proposed
four paradoxes in an effort to challenge
the accepted notions of space and time that he encountered in various philosophical circles. His
paradoxes confounded mathematicians for centuries, and it wasn't until Cantor's development (in the 1860's and
1870's) of the
theory of infinite
sets that the paradoxes could be fully resolved.
Zeno's paradoxes focus on the relation of the discrete to the continuous, an issue that is at the
very heart of mathematics. Here we will present the first of his famous four paradoxes.

Zeno's first paradox attacks the notion held by many philosophers of his day that space was
infinitely divisible, and that motion was therefore continuous.

motion is continuous.

lol that is true but the point is to prove why you know its continuious becasue its not necessarly about motion its about if you keep dividing the total distance and have a set time for each is it possible to ever reach the goal in the original set time

i dont care all to much about that.
my point about that is everything continues to moves unless there is something there to stop the momentum.

like the theory of an object in motion stays in motion unless acted apon by an outside fores??

dats wut ima talkin bout.

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:I hate writing resumes

really same but i love paradoxes

I gotta write one so i can get a job with dreamwoks studios!!!

HLOYSMOKES youd be my hero, they helped produce my favorite movie

ya they have a job opening that I would have a chance at getting im very excited!!!

ok here you go heres the answer


If we suggest that what the man says is true, then we end in
contradiction: if the man’s claim that he is lying is true, then he is
lying, in which case what he says is false.
If we suggest that what the man says is false, then we are no better
off: if the man’s claim that he is lying is false, then he is not
lying, in which case what he says is true.
Both answers give rise to logical contradictions; it cannot be the
case either that what the man says is true or that what the man says is
false.
The Liar Paradox is sometimes referred to as “Epimenides’ Paradox”,
after the sixth-century B.C. Cretan who asserted that all Cretans are
liars. The apostle Paul makes reference to Epimenides in Titus 1:12,
writing, “It was one of them, their very own prophet who said, ‘Cretans
are always liars, vicious brutes, lazy gluttons.’”
Epimenides’ statement alone does not give rise to a paradox. What he
says can’t be true, for if Cretans are always liars, and he is a
Cretan, then he must be lying, in which case his statement is false.
His statement could be false however; it could be that Epimenides is
dishonest but that not all Cretans are liars.
Paul, though, excludes this dissolution of the paradox, proceeding
to say in the following verse, “This testimony is true.” This leaves
Paul asserting that Epimenides truly said that he (and all other
Cretans) are liars, which takes us back to Eubulides’ paradox above;
Paul cannot be right.

ups gotta go byes.

shugo wrote:

Sayomi Hatake wrote:

shugo wrote:

NejiFan wrote: Give us another Shu.

ok ill give you a easy logical one



The Liar Paradox is among the simplest of paradoxes. It can be
traced back at least as far as Eubulides of Miletus, a fourth-century
B.C. Greek philosopher.
Eubulides’ version of the paradox is this: A man says that he is lying; is what he says true or false?

nooo my brain is going to explode lol ... I say hes lying

you sure

i duno cause if the guy were lying ...then he would ... wait he must be telling the truth or .... my brain ....

Sasori Kung fu masta wrote:ups gotta go byes.

bye ttul

bye sori

*sigh*